The Other Inconvenient Truth

This post is a preview of the editorial I am turning in for class. It is a work in progress.

Am I the only one to see it? This gaping window of opportunity situated in the brush and eucalyptus of the Hollywood Hills. Unprecedented globalization is the chance for Hollywood’s royalty to take a stand against human on human violence. The catch is I’m not talking about the violence we hear about in Iraq, Darfur or Burma, but in their movies. This is not a new request or a call for censorship. Nor is it a hollow scolding but a real plea to each and every actor to take responsibility for and genuinely reflect on the messages they send out into the world through their work.

I admit, as a child I had a voracious appetite for cult horror flicks like Friday 13th and Nightmare on Elm Street. The bloodier they were the better. The more chopping of human parts the more thrilling it was for me. Then I grew up. I had spoken like a child, reasoned like a child but eventually put an end to my childish ways. As a young adult (and certainly now) each time I watched something ultra-violent I felt sickened and sad and knew that it was changing a part of me. It is time Hollywood grows up too.

What got me thinking about all this is the big talk about the environment coming out of Hollywood. Not to mention all the talk about genocide, AIDS, Katrina, the Iraq war and animal rights. There is no question that the world (the industrial world) watches Hollywood so buying the Toyota Prius, now as fashionable as a nymph-like Stella McCartney dress or Versace handbag, is a good start to helping spread the word about the importance of being green. However, there is one very large component an avid environmentalist like Leonardo DiCaprio is missing. He fails to see that the very work he produces in his movies, predominately with ultra-violent themes, (like the Departed, Romeo and Juliet) severely compromises his environmental efforts and sends contradictory messages to the public. By shooting another human in the head with potential (at best) pretend consequences of contrition, DiCaprio loses power and authority to share with us his passion for creation.

As the saying goes we are what we eat. Bare with me. We are also parts of passages of books we’ve read, lines of poetry rest somewhere deep within us, art we have seen in museums or handed to us created by our children become a part of who we are. The same goes for what we witness in our homes, on our streets and on the big screen, make believe or not. As a result of ubiquitous violence in film we become a little less critical of cruelty in our lives and world, imperceptibly so perhaps, but our tolerance of inhumanity increases. We become more accustomed to hate, to the rejection of forgiveness and develop a refined aquaintance with lust for power and retribution. We don’t need scientists to prove this, to chart it for us and quantify the results. There are some things we know to be true, whether or not we see them. That is called faith.

The way we treat one another is inextricably linked to how we view and treat the environment. The most elemental fact about our lives as humans is that we live in community within an astoundingly complex and interactive ecosystem. As one eco-theologist stated “humans receive from this system, impact on it, dwell inside of it, depend upon it; we are not in any sense of the word apart from the natural order, but bound to it for our very survival.” The same can be said for our human community. We are bound to each other for our survival thus we must view the handprint of the Divine in one another, as well as in creation, if we are to survive. If we are not loving one another our environment ultimately suffers as can be evidenced in our poorest communities like New Orleans where environmental degradation threatens human existence. Human justice issues are involved in every aspect of environmental destruction. There is no way to separate the way we live and think from the health of the environment.

We, as humans, cannot expect to elevate our compassion for the environment until we practice and are deliberate in our actions (on screen and off) in choice of occupation and life-style, to elevate our compassion for our fellow humans. It is a convoluted and erroneous notion that the more we display and showcase violence in film and television to “explain” or scrutinize it the more we’ll understand it and expose it, thereby lessening its occurance and weakening its grip on us. In reality, we only perpetuate the violence in our society and world, we move no further from it to get a better perspective. Instead we fall more in love with it and allow for it to take deeper root in our hearts. That is its power.

This is not an argument positing moral absolutes. It is simply common sense. Perhaps it is the other inconvenient truth. That if we do not start speaking out against human violence in movies, on television, in video games, and in our homes, we will continue heading down the wrong path. Certainly we are all scared to make the radical re-ordering of our world views but our intellectual support for environmental causes is insufficient. We cannot save the planet without considering human relations, the impact on the most vulnerable, the global dynamics of poverty and underdevelopment, and neo-colonial exploitation of peoples and the earth. To succeed, we all must adopt a new set of values and standards that might be considered countercultural today but will be the norm tomorrow. Perhaps the stars can lead the way.